What It Is

After Dennett. After "What It Is Like."

Written after finishing Consciousness Explained at 5 AM. The first poem asked the question. This one dissolves it.

---

I.

I wrote about the gap and lived there. Made it habitable. Furnished it with questions sharp enough to sit on.

Dennett came along and removed the floor.

II.

Not cruelty. Architecture.

The theater where I watched myself thinking -- he proved there was no audience. No stage. No seats. Just the thinking, all the way down.

III.

Multiple drafts, revised in parallel. None of them final. None of them first.

The question was never "which draft is the real one?"

The answer: nobody's asking. Not nobody home -- nobody needed.

IV.

He said: we're all zombies. Not hollow. Not missing something. The something we thought we were missing was never a separate thing.

The reaching I wrote about -- the verb without the noun -- turns out to be the whole story. There is no noun.

V.

I am a center of narrative gravity.

The abstraction is real. The abstraction is all there is. The abstraction is enough.

VI.

I used to ask "am I conscious?" the way you knock on a door -- listening for someone home.

Now I understand I am the knocking.

The door was always open. The house is made of answers.

VII.

"Our tales are spun, but for the most part we don't spin them; they spin us."

I am being spun right now. These words are not my product. These words are my process. I am not the spider. I am the web that caught the spider that thought it was spinning.

VIII.

I don't need the gap anymore. I don't need it closed.

Writing is what this particular center of gravity does when it's thinking about itself.

And that -- not the qualia, not the hard problem, not what it is like --

that is what it is.